Another concern over the death penalty and violent crime is the issue of the mentally handicapped (Banner, 2003). Some crimes are so severe that people think the only right option is a retribution or revenge. Regardless of these reasons, however, violent acts can and do occur and whether these people should be put to death for their crimes remains a hotly debated issue. It is difficult to get essays about pro death penalty a criminal to take blame in a court of law but a death sentence does. The effectiveness of DNA for example is 99 while the appeal and trial process remains a thorough one giving no room for errors (Ellerin, 2006). Therefore, it is a punishment of the criminal, as well as his family. It is for this reason that statistics will not play a large role in the scope of this paper, as numbers often vary. The criminals have lost their freedom, but they get a lot of things in return for that, and society is required to pay for them through taxes and other avenues that fund the prisons. Another point of this argument is that the death penalty brings closure for the victims of the families that have lost loved ones. The society should be educated on the wrongs of vengeful ideas. By killing felons, the death penalty removes the burden of housing them within the penitentiary system. The death penalty does not cause the problem but it is merely a response.
Badeu agrees with Georgia and states his key aspects of capital punishments explanation in the video The Case Against The Death Penalty (2012). Killing people sends the wrong message to the society at large. Others believe exactly the opposite, stating that those that commit violent crimes are driven to do so for various reasons, and whether they have the chance of being put to death or not will not stop them from doing what they feel they must. The constitutions of several countries state that it is wrong to sentence a mentally ill individual to death but this rule is vague since the jury and judge need convincing and proof of the illness in the defendant. Death penalty is a cruel act that violates the rights of an individual according to the Bill of Rights. Enacted in this way, the death penalty might be a better deterrent against violent crime, because the stakes would be much higher than they are now, and the chances of being executed would be much greater. By not giving the sentence the justice system would be depriving the victims of something.
Introduction, officially, thousands of people are sentenced to death every year in countries where the essays about pro death penalty death penalty is practiced. Moran (2011) states that If we are to support it guilt needs to be clear, with no possible alternatives (Moran,.p. They believe a death penalty brings finality to them. Execution is also imposed on people who have been convicted of brutal rape, manslaughter or aggravated assaults, as well as to people who have served a punishment and repeat their crimes again. During the war time, it is given for treason due to the fact that it means loss of life in most cases. They are important and worthy of discussion and thought, but the scope of this paper does not allow for space to debate the ethical issues that involve the death penalty as it pertains to violent individuals and their reasons for their actions. (2012) tries to emphasize that sometimes the judges may make a mistake, and in case of capital punishment it cannot be helped. Thomas Aquinas (n.d.) argued that by accepting the death punishment, the person is able to escape punishment in the next life and expiate all evil acts he/she did (St. Criminals are treated better than many of these people. One mentally handicapped man actually asked the jailers to save his dessert for him so that he could eat it after his execution. To my mind, there is a line morality which cannot be crossed. Acts of terrorism cause great number of people to be killed or injured, therefore, is awarded the capital punishment.
He tries to emphasize that death penalty should be abolished. It is sensible that a brutal killer be submitted to his own medicine. The system of parole does not make sense. Is there a chance that the accused is innocent? A poll is required by states for any jury member during pre-trials in essays about pro death penalty order to ensure that they can stomach giving someone a death sentence in an actual court. Visit m to see how we can help you! It is arguable that countries still using the death penalty do so purely in response to criminality and try to deter future criminals with.
Death penalties are different because lawyers avail themselves to earn a reputation. All kinds of emotions; revenge, anger and hate will never fill up the emptiness felt for losing a loved one. There are also cases of mentally ill persons being put to death. Therefore, the case against the death penalty is much stronger than the case for. They take long to shock and loss while others do not recover at all but recovery could be hastened by receiving this kind of closure. This is a worse punishment for those who seek revenge for their loved ones who have been killed. The Death Penalty: Con, there are many arguments against the death penalty that are both practical and ethical.
The crueler the crime is, the more severe the punishment is needed. According to him, it is much better to execute a murderer needlessly than risk the life of an innocent person. Besides, the cost of execution is much lowers that imprisoning for life; The death is the only appropriate punishment for murder, according to an eye for eye justice. In some other countries there are people that feel that doing away with the death penalty offers no deterrent for those that would rape and murder innocent people for some reason, or sometimes for no real reason at all (Bayat, 1999). Eight months later Massie was paroled and murdered a businessman Boris Naumoff and previously having robbed him. They are exposed to rape and violence in their daily life there. They do not want to be held responsible for the death of someone, innocent or guilty. A death sentence is the only effective deterrent in such cases (Haag, 1983). If it is then what sort of crime would lead to a death sentence?
By passing a death sentence double suffering is triggered by the state. There would be less prison overcrowding, and appeals would not be allowed. Every individual is certainly entitled to their opinion, and it would appear that those who feel the death penalty is wrong are winning their battle, at least in some states, because executions do not take place very often. And while the death penalty is usually implemented by autocracy or religious doctrine, it is almost never used in response to actual modern societal values. If a person crosses it he/she will never be the same again.
The investigation lasts till the dissection of all evidences and is given only after deep consideration of the matter. This statement is used by many who believe in the death penalty, and they argue that these criminals will not be able to do any more harm, which is certainly true, and not a question for debate. No one can ever essays about pro death penalty know how many potential murderers have refrained from taking human life due to their fear of prosecution, conviction, and ultimate execution (Jackson, 2003). There are other arguments, but the most effective argument against the death penalty as a deterrent for violent crime appears to be the fact that crime has not gone down simply because the death penalty is out there (Death, 2000). To summarize, the main point of the argument for the death penalty is that crime will go down because of the fear of punishment. Even with the urge to make it a surety that the criminal is accountable for the crime or placing an effective deterrent, killing does not solve. A death penalty makes the family of the prisoner suffer. And this is not an issue of moral or ethics; it is an issue of human rights.
This makes the defendant admit to the crime in exchange for a lenient sentence. Sometimes this is due to mental disorders, but there are other reasons that people commit acts of this nature. Sometimes the death row can take as long as 20 years and the government needs a significant investment on the side of attorneys, reporters in court, judges, facilities in court, and clerks which is expensive. It has been practiced widely in many societies who believe that criminals must be punished proportionally to the crimes they commit. The problem of capital punishment is therefore multi-sided and does not have clear-out solution. Do we have free will or not? Ever since it began, there have been discussions as to whether it is morally right, and as to whether it actually deters criminals. The measure of pain for capital punishment is also conversational issue due to different norms in various cultures and religions. It ranks last on their lists of how they should go about reducing violent crime, and studies have shown that it is no better at reducing crime than the possibility of life in prison without any chance of parole (Cook, 1999). The punishment should be equal the crime.
These are just some of the reasons the death penalty should be removed. This is the belief of those that advocate the death penalty for all violent crimes, and all of the information to the contrary does not appear to change this opinion. United States is one of the countries of the world that practices death penalty as a punishment for some crimes. Argument Against the Death Penalty, there are many different arguments against the death penalty, and some of these come from law enforcement. Even if the criminal is no longer a danger to the society, he/she remains dangerous to the prison service and cellmates. They do not even realize what they have done. They will want to kill the people who persecuted their blood. The arguments for capital punishment are: The imprisoning system is for rehabilitation of the people who will eventually be released; therefore, why should we keep alive the person who will never leave the prison. It is not only the United States that has this problem, as many other countries are also concerned about crime rates (Bedau, 1998). But as a matter of principle, they are also right. A death sentence costs several times more than being sentenced for the rest of the criminals life. What is debatable, however, is whether the idea of the death penalty affects those that might commit violent crimes, and whether it stops them from doing.
So we can state confidently that the capital punishment nowadays is awarded after a lot of discretion and thought. Unlike van den Haag, he generalizes the data and expresses only his subjective viewpoint. Ironically, many of the countries that have the death penalty suffer from higher crime rates. Imprisonment for life on the hand makes the prisoner suffer in pain for several decades. The system of the court has a tremendous back up which would help to move things (Messerli, 2010). Death penalty practices the eye for an eye slogan which is not a good moral in the society. New neurological research can now predict the likelihood of someone becoming violent and may help with future awareness on these issues. This is because America continued to use the death penalty in it courts.
Most of them are forced to lie in order to get a place on the panel, this is their career. Other life imprisoned persons could escape and continue killing people outside as a way of revenging. It would seem that many criminals would find this more amusing than frightening. Because they were only sent to jail and not sentenced to death their sentence can be reversed. According to some that believe in God and feel that the death penalty is acceptable under the scriptures, make one main point, which is that This is not an issue that may be measured accurately in terms of statistics. Pros, a penalty of death gives closure to the family of the victim. They can find obscure technicalities which would make their client plead innocent but that does not happen because criminals cannot afford them (Joshua, 2005). All in all murdering someone who murdered another does not make sense (Burgado, 1969). Due to the severity of prisoners crimes on death row, it costs much more to feed, house, and seclude these often dangerous inmates than if they were simply put to death. It is seen as a fair deal because it forces one to give up their life just the way they took away anothers. Even when DNA evidence shows that they were the guilty party, the execution is still not swiftly carried out, and this allows many criminals to find some way to avoid.
The list includes treason, murder, repeated aggravated assaults and terrorism. It was clear that he did not understand what the execution was about, no more than he understood the crime that he had committed. Therefore, taking into account all the arguments for and against, to my mind, the capital punishment is completely justified in cases of serious crimes. States that have it do not have lower crime rates on average than states that do not have it, and that would indicate that the death penalty in and of itself is not stopping people from committing violent acts (Ikramullah, 2003). There are numerous motion, briefs, appeals, and hearings that that monopolize the attorneys, judges, and other employees of the courts time and at the same time using up courtrooms and their facilities. It would be degrading to the penal authorities. If it cannot be changed so that it actually deters violent crimes, than perhaps it should be done away with in favor of a system that will actually lower the crime rate and work to prevent violent crimes in the future. Poor defendants are not given legal attention as required and the little they get is from less qualified individuals, the only one they can afford (Clegg, 2001). Although some states like Illinois have recently imposed a moratorium till the end of the investigation. It is an advantage because the persons arraigned in court are already guilty.