Once again, this is a separate issue. . 37, in Pakistan 36, introduction death penalty essay in Iraq. As the 20th century comes to a close, it is evident that our justice system is in need of reform. What we have in fact: victim is rotting in the ground and the guilty is just sitting on the bunk and reading Bible, living on victims relatives and close people funds. If an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. Many will say that we, the taxpayers, should not pay for criminals life in prison. This particular form of punishment must be applied to all serial killers. As history has taught us, striking back at an enemy solely for revenge is only making things worse.
The death penalty is certainly a deterrent, restriction. . I used to be against the death penalty. After Dardens execution, claims were brought up that Darden was innocent. He feels that the death penalty helps to establish this fact by demonstrating that if a person commits a heinous crime such as murder, they will suffer the worst of consequences (476). Not only are there many factors to consider, but peoples values are involved and this increases the intensity of this controversy. With a death sentence, the suffering is over in seconds, while life in prison inflicts punishment for years, during which time they experience violence on a daily basis and cannot escape from. He is correct in his belief that penalties need to be inflicted upon those guilty, but his manners of carrying them out affect those who are innocent as well.
Evidence showed that the murder weapon could in no way be traced back to Darden. At the end of the last year Gallups interview, whose results traditionally considered being the most competent, showed that the death penalty is supported by 64 of Americans while only 29 declaim. The only way to get through this difficult time is not by vengeance but through forgiveness. The other example is the case of David Simelane. Another 2 756 persons were sentenced to death in 63 countries. It is easy to push aside that thought when talking about heartless, pre-meditated murder, but what about juveniles who commit the crime at a young age? Bundy was convicted of dozens of murders and executed with the help of the electric chair for the last of them in Florida (Weekes 2003, ). Public attitude depends on the location for the interview. I do not agree with that viewpoint. It is also known as capital punishment. Nowadays more than 100 countries, including Burundi, Angola, Zambia, Syria, UAE, Egypt and 38 states of the USA, apply the death penalty for the ordinary crimes.
If two people of different race are on trial for similar crimes, the colored one will be more likely to receive a death sentence. Going over all the above facts I must conclude that taking someones life, unless in defense of ones own life, is immoral, no matter the circumstances. There even thelawsof classical logicare notviolated. In 2003, 84 of penalties that became known for public were made in China, Iran, the USA and Vietnam. In Connecticut, which is more liberal state, there are less of supporters of the death penalty. The death penalty has especially intensive discussion in the USA as each state has its own attitude to this issue. Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments. There is no place for liberalism. What about the lives of those wrongly accused, such as the case of Willie Darden. It has been banned in many countries, including the United States.
By referring to my own personal experience I can express my opinion on whether I feel it should be kept or abolished. However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as a society to see that it is done. Moreover, while being in prison he could be engaged in some kind of beneficial activity. In my opinion capital punishment lowers the value of a human life and violates morality of our society. Gallup has been introduction death penalty essay asking about attitude to the death penalty since 1936 when it was supported by 59 in contrast to 38 of American respondents that declaimed. These defense attorneys are not paid well and are probably working on several cases simultaneously, consequently they are unlikely to do their best. There is the reason to believe that this figure is much higher in fact: in March 2004, a Senior Representative of the Legislative Authority of China stated that about 10 000 of persons are annually executed in China. Justice refers to fairness, but when innocent lives are threatened, is this fair? Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death. An eye for an eye, is what some Americans would say concerning the death penalty. Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty.
What makes the process so long are the endless appeals, motions, briefs, and additional required procedures, which are to determine if the criminal really deserves the death penalty. According to the All-Russian Public Opinion Research Centre, 79 of Russians stand for the death penalty for rapists of minors (Baumgartner 2009, 1604).In addition, 65 stand for the death penalty for terrorists and 60 for committing premeditated murder. With all of these lives being taken, there is a possibility that mistakes could be made. Koch argues that all other forms of punishment are insufficient, yet he does not clarify why. Arguing about the death penalty, weighing the pros and cons, I come to the conclusion that the death penalty is needed to penalize for serious crimes. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. One year ago my friend was shot and killed introduction death penalty essay execution style for no apparent reason. If to consider Bundys case, I support the decision of the court. Koch claims that an error here or there is no big deal, but are 23 errors a big deal, not to mention the falsely convicted people who were luckier than Darden? Almost the same rate was observed throughout the last decade (Schaefer 2009, 176). Other countries also supported the death penalty, for instance, Russia is among them.
One also should realize that criminals are real people who are able to experience the feeling of fear, pain, and other emotions just as we all can. Justice is needed for crimes committed in society today. There are criminals that have not any hope to be reclaimed and they cannot cause a pity to normal person serial killers, sadists The death penalty is the only one decision in such cases. There are a lot of supporters of the death penalty all around the world. As it is written in the article The death penalty in the United States and worldwide, historically, execution has served as a significant form of punishment for criminal behavior and for deviance from social norms. Sometimes it changes dramatically under the influence of just one, but particularly brutal crime. Do we want to take the responsibility for it then?
Deterrence, in Kochs eyes, also represents how valuable life. That is actually one of Albert Camuss observations. Wouldnt it be more suitable to sentence the criminal to life in prison, which is certainly not a pleasant experience by any means? The article that I had read indicated that the cost of a capital trial combined with the jail term and execution is significantly higher than supporting the prisoner for the rest of his prison life. Murders had continued since the late 90s of the last century until 2001 when Simelane was arrested after anonymous statement to the police. It sounds ridiculous to me that more humane methods to kill criminals are constantly being developed. This policy portrays the country as violent and immoral, and in turn triggers anti-Americanism around the world. During the process of investigation he brought investigators to the mass grave where 45 corpses were found, including pregnant women. Koch uses his essay The. Arguments in favor and against the death penalty can be found in religious texts (eye for an eye, thou shalt not kill). The eye for an eye way of thinking does not seem to be appropriate one.
Maybe the fact that this multi-millionaire was able to afford the best attorney, plenty of investigators, and experts of his choice had something to do with. He escaped from country jails two times till he finally was arrested in February, 1978. Moreover, a lot of respondents (63) consider the death penalty to be applied not as often as it is needed in the USA (Roe 2005, 14). Furthermore, the murderer may have such a strong desire to end someones life that he does not really care about the punishment that will be due. In 2008, the number of executions in Iran was 346, in Saudi Arabia 102, in the.S. The public attitude often varies according to the variations of the crime rates. He is considered to be the bloodiest serial killer of the Kingdom of Swaziland and possibly the whole Africa. For instance, in Utah that is one of the most conservative states, 79 of its population supported the death penalty, and just 16 of population declaimed that penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. The outcome is still the same, legal murder. The first is that there is a possibility of error. The brutality, which they committed the crime with, must not go unpunished. The fact that we feel such disgust toward murderers is common, yet to punish the criminal in exactly the same way that made us hate him sounds ridiculous.
A jury admitted David Simelane guilty in 28 murders and the Judge sentenced him to the death penalty in 9 days. If to make the penalty public, to sell tickets and to broadcast them on TV, there are few people who will not seriously take thought before committing anything like that. No matter if it is a firing squad, gas chamber, electric chair, lethal injection, or guillotine, each and every way designed to kill a person is immoral and cruel. However, this is yet another problem of our current court system. As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole. One should realize that if the terrorists had a choice they would definitely prefer instant death than humiliation of lifelong prison. According to this principle, punishment for causing death of another person is the death penalty.
It may be considered from this point of view as the means for society protection. Neither society nor countries in general are introduction death penalty essay ready for this. I cannot imagine that in todays world killing thousands of people just because of lack of space in prisons would advance the cause of justice. In addition to discriminating against the poor, capital punishment is also racist. There should always be accountability for crime and an effective deterrent in place, but killing someone who killed does not make much sense. Death Penalty : Can It Ever Be Justified?
Theodore Robert Bundy is a famous American serial killer, rapist, kidnapper, and necrophile. Whether that fact should influence our stand on the issue, I do not know, but I believe it is always good to live in harmony with others if possible. God gave us life, and He should be the only one to take it away from. I would not want to put a price on human life, but there seems to be an important argument between pro and con death penalty parties regarding the financial matters of the issue. At least 1 146 persons were executed in 28 countries during 2003 (Rogers 2008, 145).
It cant be disputed sadly, the rich are more likely to get off with a lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong. Considering the long process of waiting on death row, I also should point out that it clogs our court system tremendously. But how can we talk about any kind of restoration if nothing can bring their family member to life and nothing will soothe the pain of their loss. According to the organization Amnesty International, in 2008 the highest number of executions occurred in China (1718). It is the foundation on which everything else is built upon. It is both cruel and costly. However, it seems obvious to some Americans that the death penalty is a just and proper way to handle convicted murderers. There are as many supporters of the death penalty as opponents of this form of punishment; and there almost no indifferent people to this issue. Supporters of capital punishment might argue that this kind of punishment is important for the family of the victim of a crime as it will bring them closure and the feeling that the status quo has been restored. Life sentence can be the alternative for the death penalty but there is the problem with places for convicts in some countries. Criminals must be punished and the criminals who committed serious crimes and take a lot of lives should be sentenced to the death penalty.
Though Kochs apprehensions are concerns for many when it comes to capital punishment, his execution solution contains flaws and is not the right answer for solving the murder and justice problems in society. What about the value of human life though? Most citizens would be in agreement that such inhumane crimes deserve severe ramifications, but ending a life to make up for an unlawful death would contradict these principles of the value of life. Supporters of the death penalty ask the question, Why should I, an honest hardworking taxpayer, have to pay to support a murderer for the rest of their natural life? The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this society. The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. Taking the life of another is considered the most terrible of crimes, and I agree that it deserves the harshest punishment; but at the same time I do not think that taking a life for a life is the right solution. Opponents of the death penalty do not agree and have a valid argument when they say, The claims that capital punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not proven. Therefore, I believe that the government should never have such an absolute power that would allow it to kill its subjects. Eventually he was charged in 34 murders, 28 of which were proved in court. Bud Welch supports this theory. Yet our highest form of punishment is no different than the crime it is supposed to punish.
Although the amount of states that abolish the death penalty is constantly growing, in general the attitude to it remains almost the same. If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, introduction death penalty essay not in the death penalty. About two years ago, whenever the issue of death penalty would come up, I"d think about what the Bible says which is "you shall not kill." I thought that the death penalty was simply a form of revenge. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees. Ask our professional writer!
We have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities. The topic of capital punishment raises many issues as it deals with the strong emotions of people. Attorneys said that key witnesses introduction death penalty essay were not allowed to testify and the one witness that did testify claimed all black people looked alike to her. It is almost obvious that death penalty affects poor people more often than the wealthy ones. And by abolishing the death penalty we can prove that we are better people than these criminals. Taking of an innocent life cannot be compensated, so why more pain should be inflicted by another life being taken away? And even if one would be afraid of loosing his own life, I believe that most of the criminals think that they will not be caught and will not have to suffer the consequences. Our society punishes a murderer by murdering him, as capital punishment is nothing but a legal murder. This research paper supports the idea that death penalty is necessary for our society. I thought of it as cruel, wrong, and immoral and does not belong in the penal system to prevent crime.
It is already hard for them to acknowledge that their loved one had committed a crime, so why double their pain by putting their family member to death if it does not have to be that way? Do we have the right to take someones life away? If Komisarjevsky is convicted during the impending trial, 72 of residents in contrast to 22 would like to see him executed. We criticize Saddam Hussein for killing his own people, yet we allow similar conduct in our country. It seems to me that if you only have money you can get away with murder literally. Instead we could get rid of murderers permanently and use our scarce resources in other areas. To defend capital punishment. At the same time it tries to teach us that violence is wrong and does not solve problems. I always thought of it as a "cruel and unusual" punishment. For example, people drink and drive knowing it might cost them their life, but they still exhibit that irrational behavior. There is no evidence that the death penalty deters killers, since they might as well be killed while committing the crime. All other facts aside, is it not simply the end to another life? Supporting the death penalty its worth recalling that: The death penalty brings harmony to the well-known principle of law in general the principle of justice.
Citizens have the most negative reaction in regard to the death penalty application to individuals that incriminated in corruption (66 treason (65 and commitment the armed robbery (62) (Baumgartner 2009, 1606). Considering about the life sentence as an alternative to the death penalty, its worth reminding the cost of the dangerous special criminal keeping in prison including the payment for the prison guard and thinking that maybe it would. The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. That was then, but from what I have recently experienced, I have a whole different feeling about the death penalty. From the Death Penalty Information Center website, William Bowers, a Northwestern University criminologist, states that society is brutalized by the use of the death penalty, and this increases the likelihood of more murder. First of all, it is unusual that the District Attorney in California did not seek the death penalty in a double first degree murder case. Everybody has instinct for life but we also do risky things. Bundy denied his guilt for years but eventually he admitted to more than 30 murders although actually the total amount of his victims remains unknown. Even more surprising is the fact that there is a 37 higher murder rate in death penalty states than in non- death penalty states (Innocence and the Death Penalty). In 1966, the popularity of the death penalty has fallen to the lowest point at the moment it was supported by 47 of respondents, and against. The second argument against capital punishment is that it is unfair in its administration.
One alternative, life imprisonment, keeps murderers off of the streets and prevents them from killing again. A study by the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty confirmed that there have been over 750 executions since 1976. Next Essays Related to Death Penalty Opinion. For example, a life sentence in a secure jail would ensure that the killer would not be able to take another life. Welch, although enduring the greatest pain of all, concluded that Timothy McVeighs execution is simply vengeance; and it was vengeance that killed Julie. Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. . It is what they deserve. It is final and cannot be reversed.
So, instead of wasting time and money on determining if one deserves capital punishment, we could send him to prison for life and use the saved resources to solve other legal matters. Our justice system is not perfect in determining guilt and innocence. In the next sentence, he professes that human life deserves special protection (477). The situation is similar to that one which had the place in 2003 when the other interview showed that there were 78 of the states population supporting the death penalty and 17 declaimed that. According to the interview made by the Kuinnipiek University t, 67 of registered voters support the death penalty (Roe 2005, 16). I believe that no reason can be proposed to justify the death penalty. One should realize that human beings are very complicated and capital punishment does not necessarily scare everyone. Along with Bowers, introduction death penalty essay 84 of experts in the academic criminological society say that their research has concluded no proof that the death penalty is a successful deterrent (In Opposition to the Death Penalty : Deterrence). She then pointed out Darden from a line-up composed of all white men, except for Darden. The true figures are much higher, of course (Philip 2011, 13). Does this statement not include all human life?
He believes that capital punishment can prevent future murders by eliminating the murderer and making potential murderers think twice about committing a crime (478). Kochs concern for justice in America is reasonable, but his means of attaining it are not as effective as he would like to believe. 74 in contact to 21 of respondents support the idea of the death penalty to be applied to Hayes who has been already convicted. We are civilized human beings who can solve problems in more moral, less barbaric and better ways. These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unintended loss. I believe that the death penalty is an extreme but necessary measure. The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding.
Essay : Death Penalty. You have heard from the affirmative side and you may disagree or agree with. The death penalty is not cruel and unusual because most states favor the lethal injection, which is not cruel in anyway. Death Penalty Introduction : The most severe of all sentences: that of death. Capital punishment or death penalty is a very common topic for writing a pros introduction death penalty essay and cons essay, and many students choose it as a really great issue.
From John Lee Malvo to innocent citizens on death row, everybody seems to have an opinion on this touchy subject. As the nation states of Europe became more established and distinct, a shared European identity became stronger. If you did that in New York, people would treat you like shit. We recognize ourselves in the literature of ancient Greece and Rome. My grandmother ran a corner store in Maine in the 1950s. how much does it matter what message a city sends? As a consequence, our universities are now active agents of ongoing cultural destruction. I'd always considered ambition a good thing, but I realize now that was because I'd always implicitly understood it to mean ambition in the areas I cared about. Candles rationed to one pound per family per week, and the regulation enforced by the constabulary.